IPO
Manika Plastech IPO
Design-led rigid polymer packaging manufacturer making injection-moulded battery casings, pails and thin-wall containers for industries including energy storage, paints, chemicals, food and dairy.
QuickIPO View
Mixed
Growth is encouraging, but customer concentration, execution and governance risks keep conviction moderate.
Quick Summary
Five things that matter before you decide.
Design-led rigid polymer packaging manufacturer making injection-moulded battery casings, pails and thin-wall containers for industries including energy storage, paints, chemicals, food and dairy. Largest disclosed product line: 56.5% of FY26 revenue.
Read full answer ↓Revenue +20.8%; PAT +94.2%; FY26 operating cash remained positive.
Read full answer ↓74% is fresh issue; about 72% of planned machinery orders were pending.
Read full answer ↓63% of revenue from top 5 customers; historical governance / record-keeping disclosures.
Read full answer ↓~18.2× FY26 earnings vs selected peer average 35.1×.
Read full answer ↓What Changed Today
Public bidding is now open
Manika Plastech opened for public bidding on September 11, 2026 and is scheduled to close on September 16, 2026. The price band is ₹40 to ₹43 per share. Grey-market premium is being tracked separately as unofficial market data and is not part of the QuickIPO research signal. No official subscription multiple has been captured in this package yet.
SEBI/NSE current offer documents support the issue dates and price band. Unofficial GMP is stored separately in the live market snapshot. · Updated 11 Sep 2026, 1:22 PM
Similar IPOs
What happened when similar companies came to market?
What does this tell us about Manika Plastech?
A good listing day does not always mean a good long-term result. For Manika Plastech, look beyond the first-day return and focus on the business, where the IPO money goes, and what the company delivers later.
Compare similar IPOsMarket outcome first, IPO-time business comparison secondView comparison ↓
Swipe sideways to compare →
What happened after similar IPOs listed?
This shows what happened to the share price after listing. We keep stock performance separate from how the business performed.
| Similar IPO | Listed | IPO price | Listing price | Current price | 52W high | 52W low | Since listing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technopack Polymers IPOVerified package snapshot ↗ | 2022 | ₹55 | ₹77.70 | ₹11.054 Sep 2026 14:43:06 | ₹23 | ₹10.70 | -85.8% |
| Cool Caps Industries IPOVerified package snapshot ↗ | 2022 | ₹38 | ₹35.90Adjusted basis ₹3.59 | ₹25.3010 Sep 2026 9:48 AM | ₹99.50 | ₹19 | +604.7%Adjusted for split/bonus |
| Shree Tirupati Balajee Agro Trading IPOVerified package snapshot ↗ | 2024 | ₹83 | ₹90 | ₹25.1711 Sep 2026 12:51:48 | ₹54.48 | ₹21.10 | -72.0% |
Latest available market snapshot. SME stocks can trade infrequently, so current-price dates may differ. “Since listing” is calculated by QuickIPO. Verified split/bonus adjustments are applied when needed.
What were these companies like when they came to IPO?
Compare what they did, where the IPO money went, how dependent they were on a few customers, and whether they later delivered what they promised.
| Manika Plastech IPO | Technopack Polymers IPO | Cool Caps Industries IPO | Shree Tirupati Balajee Agro Trading IPO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What they make | Design-led rigid polymer packaging manufacturer making injection-moulded battery casings, pails and thin-wall containers for industries including energy storage, paints, chemicals, food and dairy. | PET preforms and HDPE beverage caps/closures. | Plastic bottle caps and PET preforms used in packaging. | Flexible intermediate bulk containers and other woven industrial-packaging products. |
| IPO money mainly for | ₹54.929 crore for capital expenditure; ₹15.000 crore for debt repayment/prepayment; for general corporate purposes. | Additional SACMI cap/closure manufacturing equipment, working capital and general corporate purposes. | Working capital and general corporate purposes. | Debt repayment, working capital for the company and subsidiaries, and general corporate purposes. |
| Owners sold shares? | Yes | No — the ₹7.865 crore issue was entirely fresh. | No — the ₹11.628 crore issue was entirely fresh. | Yes — about ₹47.23 crore was offer for sale alongside about ₹122.43 crore of fresh issue. |
| Customer dependence | Top 5 customers: 62.95% of FY26 revenue from operations. Top 10 customers: 73.45% of FY26 revenue from operations. | Top 10 customers contributed about 69% of FY22 revenue. | Top 10 customers contributed 38.85% of FY22 revenue. | Top 10 customers contributed 46.20% of FY24 revenue. |
| Promise delivered? | Tracking | Expansion started; full fund-use completion not independently verified. | Not independently verified yet. | Core use of proceeds delivered; a small issue-expense balance remained. |
Only verified comparable values are shown. Comparable selection is reviewed before later outcomes are considered.
Full Research
Five questions that matter before you decide.
Answer first. Evidence underneath. Start with the business, then check growth, IPO money, risks and price.
What does this company actually do?
In simple terms: Manika is a rigid-packaging manufacturer with a meaningful position in battery casings. Its customers come from several industries, while battery casings and a relatively small customer group still account for a large part of sales.
Manika makes rigid plastic packaging used in industries such as energy storage, paints, chemicals, food and dairy. Its main products include battery casings, pails and thin-wall containers.
Battery casings contributed 56.54% of FY26 revenue, while pails and thin-wall containers contributed 30.51%. Northern India contributed 53.31% of FY26 revenue.
The company operated seven facilities, including six manufacturing facilities and one painting facility. The company could produce about 28,300 tonnes a year in FY26, rising to about 29,200 tonnes a year by June 2026.
Is the business really growing?
Sales have grown steadily, profit has increased faster than sales, operating cash flow has remained positive and debt has reduced relative to equity. These are supportive financial trends, although future growth still depends on execution.
Revenue from operations increased from ₹360.77 crore in FY24 to ₹435.98 crore in FY26. Profit after tax increased from ₹11.53 crore to ₹22.40 crore over the same period.
FY26 operating profit margin before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA margin) was 13.34%. Return on net worth was 15.18%, while return on capital employed was 18.77%. These return measures indicate how efficiently the company generated profit from shareholder funds and overall capital.
Cash from operations was ₹44.30 crore in FY26 compared with ₹22.40 crore of profit after tax. Cash from operations was also positive at ₹35.42 crore in FY24 and ₹36.88 crore in FY25.
The debt-to-equity ratio fell from 0.86 times in FY24 to 0.60 times in FY26. Total borrowings at the end of FY26 were ₹88.19 crore.
Where does the IPO money go?
Most of the offer value is fresh capital for the company, with plant and machinery and debt repayment as the main specified uses. The main execution point is that much of the planned machinery ordering still remained to be completed when the RHP was filed.
At the upper price of ₹43, the IPO is about ₹125.50 crore. About ₹92.50 crore is fresh money going to the company and about ₹33.00 crore is existing shares being sold through the offer for sale.
From the fresh issue, ₹54.93 crore is planned for plant and machinery and ₹15.00 crore for repayment or pre-payment of borrowings. The remaining net proceeds are intended for general corporate purposes.
The RHP says purchase orders had not yet been placed for about 72.12% of the proposed plant-and-machinery amount. By July 31, 2026, ₹3.84 crore had already been paid as advances to suppliers from the company’s own funds.
What can go wrong?
The main things to watch are customer and battery-casing concentration, the amount of machinery ordering still pending, and the historical governance and record-keeping disclosures in the RHP.
The top five customers contributed 62.95% of FY26 revenue and the top ten contributed 73.45%. This level of dependence means losing or receiving fewer orders from a major customer could affect sales.
Battery casings contributed 56.54% of FY26 revenue. The top ten suppliers accounted for 62.70% of FY26 purchases, so both product and supplier concentration need attention.
The offer documents disclose that Manika Automotive Private Limited had losses and negative cash flow in past periods. They also disclose historical related-party transactions and a promoter structure that includes VRIDAA Holding Trust and other trusts in the promoter group.
The company also states that bank statements for certain historical share allotments could not be traced. A separate past reporting non-compliance involving an erstwhile subsidiary resulted in MCA fines on individual promoters.
Purchase orders had not yet been placed for about 72.12% of the proposed plant-and-machinery amount to be funded from IPO proceeds. This leaves a meaningful part of the planned expansion to be executed after the offer.
Am I paying too much?
The announced price appears lower than the selected peer benchmark when measured against Manika’s FY26 earnings. But peer companies differ in scale and product mix, so the peer average is a reference point rather than proof that the IPO is cheap.
A lower P/E than selected peers is only a reference point. Differences in size, products and business quality still matter.
The announced price band is ₹40 to ₹43 per share. Manika reports FY26 earnings per share of ₹2.36.
The RHP shows Hitech Corporation at 37.85 times earnings and Mold-Tek Packaging at 32.34 times. Manika reports a selected peer average of 35.10 times.
Shaily Engineering Plastics was shown at 88.85 times earnings, but Manika identifies it as an outlier and excludes it from the 35.10 times peer average. FY26 return on net worth was 15.18% and return on capital employed was 18.77%.
After listing
After the IPO, we don’t stop watching.
Promise vs Delivery
We track whether the company used IPO money as promised and whether the planned expansion was actually delivered.
View Promise vs Delivery →Evidence14 sources · Primary filings prioritised · Verified 11 Sep 2026View all sources ↓
QuickIPO simplifies publicly available IPO information for education and research. It is not personalised investment advice or a recommendation to apply, buy, sell or hold any security.